There's a bit of the image shaved off the bottom for me in navigation mode (using IE 6.0 with address, navbuttons and menu bar enabled) and it tiles prematurely if I hit F11 to view in fullscreen mode. It's not much of a loss, though; your name just gets the bottom clipped a bit.
I've never understood how people could use backgrounds like that though; with objects and borders and words. I find it too distracting whenever my BGs are not a pattern or colour shift or some such.
Final analysis: it displays pretty much correctly for me.
Yay! Thanks. ^_^ Eh, I like fancy backgrounds. They don't bother me. It's sized right for my screen, at 1024, but it would be a bit off when you have more nav bars than I do. ^_~
no subject
Date: 2003-01-08 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-08 06:39 pm (UTC)Thanks for commenting. ^_^
b/g
Date: 2003-01-08 05:02 pm (UTC)Re: b/g
Date: 2003-01-09 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-08 06:50 pm (UTC)There's a bit of the image shaved off the bottom for me in navigation mode (using IE 6.0 with address, navbuttons and menu bar enabled) and it tiles prematurely if I hit F11 to view in fullscreen mode. It's not much of a loss, though; your name just gets the bottom clipped a bit.
I've never understood how people could use backgrounds like that though; with objects and borders and words. I find it too distracting whenever my BGs are not a pattern or colour shift or some such.
Final analysis: it displays pretty much correctly for me.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 08:28 am (UTC)Eh, I like fancy backgrounds. They don't bother me.
It's sized right for my screen, at 1024, but it would be a bit off when you have more nav bars than I do. ^_~
no subject
Date: 2003-01-08 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-09 08:30 am (UTC)It's here: http://www.auburn.edu/~shropmr/images/ljbkg.PNG